Disputes are inevitable, particularly when dealing with complex contracts, cross-border transactions, or long-term partnerships. As businesses seek efficient, confidential, and fair methods of resolving conflicts, arbitration has emerged as a preferred solution.
Arbitration offers parties a streamlined process of resolving disputes privately and efficiently. However, when international elements are involved, the dynamics shift, leading to what is known as international arbitration.
International arbitration significantly differs from domestic arbitration. While both aim to resolve disputes outside of national courts, international arbitration involves parties from different countries, complex legal frameworks, and a global perspective.
As businesses expand and become more globalized, understanding the differences between these two forms of arbitration becomes crucial, especially for B2B (Business to Business) companies operating across borders.
This article at Youssef + Partners explores these distinctions in detail, highlighting the benefits and challenges of each process to help businesses navigate the complexities of arbitration in domestic and international contexts.
But first, let’s review the terms “arbitration” and “international arbitration.”
What is Arbitration?
Definition and Purpose
Arbitration is one of various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes that allows parties to resolve their disputes outside traditional national courts’ systems. It is a consensual process in which involved parties agree to refer their disputes to one or more arbitrators for a final and binding decision. The key advantages of arbitration is that it provides a quicker, more flexible, confidential, tailored process that is often a more cost-effective solution compared to litigation.
In arbitration, parties have greater control over the process. They can appoint the arbitrator(s), agree on procedural rules, governing law, and maintain confidentiality throughout the proceedings. The flexibility makes arbitration particularly appealing to businesses seeking to avoid courtroom litigation.
The Arbitration Process
The arbitration process includes the following main steps:
- Agreement to arbitrate: Parties to a contract usually make an early decision to refer their disputes to arbitration. Thus, companies entering into contracts agree to include an arbitration clause in the contract. This clause typically states that in the event of a dispute, the parties agree to resolve the matter through arbitration rather than litigation. At this stage, they also agree on the governing law of the contract, the seat of arbitration, the applicable arbitration rules and the number of arbitrators.
- Request for Arbitration: Once a dispute arises and the parties are incapable of solving their disputes, a disgruntled party then issues a Request for Arbitration under the arbitration clause with the basic facts of the case and a summary of its claims. Thus, the arbitration process is begun.
- Selection of arbitrators: The parties can either agree on a single arbitrator or choose a panel. Arbitrators are often appointed by the parties based on their expertise on the subject matter and who can provide a high level of specialized knowledge than a typical judge might not have.
- Proceedings: The arbitration process is generally less formal than national court trials. The parties submit their arguments, supported by evidence, present witnesses, including expert witnesses. Parties typically have an input on the process, whether document discovery phase will be necessary; and thus, they typically have more flexibility in arbitration proceedings.
- Award: After reviewing the arguments and evidence, typically after an oral hearing, the arbitrator(s) render a decision, known as an award, which is legally final and binding, which means that there is no appeal whatsoever based on alleged errors committed by the arbitrator(s). While most national arbitration laws provide for some sort of possible court oversight on the process, typically such oversight by means of a request for the nullification of the award is largely limited to gross errors or abuses of process, and typically do not go to the merits or the substance of the case.
Types of Arbitration:
- Ad-Hoc arbitration: in this type, the arbitration is not administered by an institution, and the parties must agree on the procedural rules governing the arbitration. This allows for greater flexibility but requires more coordination between the parties. However, when the parties are already facing disputes, such coordination between the parties is not to be easily expected and ad-hoc arbitration is often riddled with intense friction.
- Institutional arbitration: in contrast, institutional arbitration is administered by an arbitration institution (e.g., the American Arbitration Association or the International Chamber of Commerce). These institutions provide well-established balanced rules and processes to follow, which can streamline the arbitration process, which greatly limit unnecessary friction.
Key Benefits of Arbitration:
- Confidentiality: Unlike court trials, arbitration proceedings are usually private and confidential, which protects the parties’ sensitive information.
- Control over process: Parties can customize the arbitration process to suit their needs, such as selecting the governing law, applicable rules, translation requirements, arbitrators or setting timelines.
- Finality: Arbitration awards are final and binding, with limited grounds for challenging the decision.
Stay Updated
What is International Arbitration?
Definition and Scope
International arbitration refers to arbitration that involves parties from different countries or where the subject matter of the dispute crosses national borders. This form of arbitration is particularly relevant in international trade, investment disputes, and multinational contracts. It is often seen as the preferred method for resolving cross-border disputes. International arbitration offers neutrality, enforceability, and the ability to handle complex international legal issues without litigation.
Legal Framework
A web of treaties, conventions, and national laws govern international arbitration. The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards is the most notable.[1] This treaty, signed by over 172 countries, ensures that arbitration awards made in one member country can be recognized and enforced in another with minor or limited grounds for rejection of enforcement and avoiding the typically more complex, lengthy and often near-impossible process of recognition of a foreign court decision. This makes international arbitration awards highly effective ad global tools for the enforcement of final and binding decisions.
Several international arbitration institutions specialize in handling cross-border disputes, including:
- International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)
- London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)
- Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC)
- American Arbitration Association (AAA)
These institutions provide well-established, neutral, time-tested standardized rules and administrative support and often can appoint highly qualified, credible arbitrators to ensure fair and neutral proceedings.
Key Distinctions in International Arbitration:
- Multiple jurisdictions: International arbitration must navigate the legal systems of multiple countries, multiple laws, and languages, both in conducting the arbitration itself, taking into consideration its legal seat and where the award might be enforced.
- Neutral venues: To avoid bias, the arbitration process often takes place in a neutral country agreed upon by the involved parties.
- Complexity of legal systems: International arbitration may involve different laws governing different aspects of the contract, the need for translations, arbitration rules and procedures that take into consideration differing legal backgrounds, witnesses from multiple countries, and the eventual enforcement of an award potentially in multiple differing jurisdictions, making the process more complex than domestic arbitration.
Key Differences Between Arbitration and International Arbitration
While there are some similarities between arbitration and international arbitration, there are some distinctive features between them, including the following:
Jurisdiction
The main difference between arbitration and international arbitration is jurisdiction. Domestic arbitration occurs within a single legal system, whereas international arbitration involves parties from different countries and legal proceedings that often involve multiple jurisdictions.
In domestic arbitration, the applicable law is usually straightforward: it is the law of the country where the arbitration occurs. However, in international arbitration, the applicable law could be the laws of one or more nations, requiring the arbitrators to consider various legal frameworks in making a final decision, or a different law of a country chosen by the parties in their arbitration agreement.
Legal Framework
Domestic arbitration is bound by the laws and rules of the country in which it takes place. For example, in the U.S., arbitration proceedings might follow the Federal Arbitration Act. International arbitration, on the other hand, is often governed by international treaties such as the New York Convention and institutional rules provided by bodies like the ICC or LCIA.
Enforcement of Awards
Under the New York Convention, enforceability is one of the main benefits of international arbitration. This term means that a business in one country can fairly easily enforce an arbitration award seated in another country.
Complexity
International arbitration tends to be more complex than domestic arbitration due to the involvement of multiple legal systems, languages, and cultural considerations.
In addition, cross-border disputes often involve more significant sums of money and more complex business transactions, leading to a need for more detailed proceedings.
Costs and Time
Because of the complexities mentioned, international arbitration can be more expensive and time-consuming than domestic arbitration. The need for translation services, international arbitrators of international caliber, detailed expert witness testimonies including industry and quantum evaluations, and travel can increase costs.
Navigating different legal frameworks and logistical challenges can extend the time needed to resolve the dispute.
Advantages of International Arbitration in the B2B Context
Neutrality
In cross-border disputes, businesses often fear that resolving disputes in the other party’s national state may result in bias and disadvantages. International arbitration addresses this concern by allowing the parties to choose a neutral venue with qualified international arbitrators from different countries. This reduces the potentiality of partiality and increases trust in the arbitration process.
Enforceability
One of the most critical factors in favor of international arbitration is the ease of globally enforcing awards. Under the New York Convention, businesses can seek enforcement of awards in the over 172 countries that signed the convention. The result is that international arbitration is a more reliable option for cross-border contract enforcement.
Expert Arbitrators
International arbitration allows businesses to select subject matter experts with specialized knowledge relevant to the dispute. These experts may have expertise in specific industries or international law, which can lead to more informed decisions and quicker resolutions.
Customization and Flexibility
Like domestic arbitration, international arbitration offers businesses the flexibility to customize procedural rules, which is particularly important in international disputes. Each party can adapt the process to fit the complexities of cross-border transactions, making it a highly adaptable method for resolving international business disputes.
When to Use Arbitration vs. International Arbitration
Domestic vs. Cross-Border Transactions
When a business dispute arises within one country, domestic arbitration is usually sufficient. However, international arbitration occurs when the dispute involves cross-border transactions, such as global supply chains or joint ventures with foreign partners.
Type of Contracts
International arbitration occurs in disputes arising from contracts with foreign suppliers, customers, or joint venture partners for example.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
International arbitration may be more expensive due to its complexities, but it often provides greater enforceability and neutrality.
Conclusion
Whether domestic or international, arbitration offers a powerful and flexible alternative to traditional national courts’ litigation. However, the complexities of cross-border business transactions make international arbitration particularly attractive for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions.
Understanding the primary differences between domestic and international arbitrations, such as jurisdiction, legal framework, enforcement, and costs, can help businesses make more informed decisions when drafting contracts and resolving disputes. By choosing the right form of arbitration agreements tailored to their needs, businesses can ensure a more efficient, neutral, and enforceable resolution to their disputes.
[1] See New York Convention, established June 10, 1958.
Available at United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement | New York Convention:1 here
Stay Updated
FAQ: Difference Between Arbitration and International Arbitration
How can you distinguish between an international arbitral award and a domestic arbitral award?
An international arbitral award is issued in disputes involving parties from different countries or governed by international agreements, while a domestic arbitral award is confined to disputes under the laws and jurisdiction of a single country.
What are the advantages of arbitration?
Arbitration offers confidentiality, faster resolutions than court cases, and the flexibility to select arbitrators and procedures.
Are the rules different for arbitration and international arbitration?
Yes, arbitration rules can vary based on the jurisdiction or arbitration institution, whereas international arbitration often follows globally recognized rules like those of the ICC or UNCITRAL.
Can arbitration awards be enforced internationally?
Domestic arbitration awards may have limited enforcement, but international arbitration awards are enforceable in many countries under treaties like the New York Convention.
- https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english [↩]
