Youssef & Partners has authored an insightful Global Arbitration Review (GAR) Report on investment treaty arbitration in Egypt, showcasing the firm’s extensive expertise in this area. This publication offers a detailed analysis of Egypt’s investment treaty framework and its implications for both foreign investors and the state. It examines key aspects such as substantive protections, procedural rights, and enforcement mechanisms. Below is a summary of the key topics covered:
Egypt’s investment treaties are designed to create a stable and secure environment for foreign investors, offering comprehensive protections and reliable dispute resolution mechanisms. Through a network of bilateral and multilateral investment treaties (BITs and MITs), Egypt provides foreign investors with assurances, such as fair and equitable treatment, protection against unlawful expropriation, and the most-favored-nation (MFN) clause
Key Features of Egypt’s Investment Treaties
- Egypt is party to numerous bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and multilateral investment treaties (MITs), which offer a range of protections to foreign investors. These include:
- Fair and equitable treatment (FET): ensuring that investors are treated fairly and without discrimination.
- Expropriation Protections: safeguarding against unlawful expropriation and ensuring compensation at market value.
- Most-favored-nation (MFN) status: guaranteeing that foreign investors receive treatment no less favorable than that accorded to investors from any third state.
- Security assurances: providing full protection and security to investments.
- Many BITs also include umbrella clauses, which extend treaty protections to obligations beyond contractual agreements, ensuring a broader scope of protection for investors.
Investor Protections and Procedural Considerations
Egypt’s BITs provide robust procedural rights, including access to international arbitration mechanisms such as ICSID and UNCITRAL rules. This ensures that investor-state disputes can be resolved outside domestic courts, offering a neutral and a reliable forum for dispute resolution. Key procedural features including: .
- Cooling-Off Periods: some treaties require a cooling-off period before arbitration can be initiated, allowing for amicable settlement attempts.
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies: while a few BITs require the exhaustion of local remedies, the majority allow investors to bypass local courts and proceed directly to arbitration.
Attitude Toward Arbitration and Enforcement in Egypt
Egyptian courts generally support arbitration and prioritize international obligations over conflicting domestic laws. The country’s compliance with the ICSID and New York Conventions enhances the enforceability of arbitral awards, with courts prioritizing international obligations over conflicting domestic laws. However, courts also balance their approach by addressing public policy concerns and corruption risks in some cases.
Challenges and Developments in Investment Arbitration
Following political shifts post-2011, Egypt faced an influx of arbitration cases. Despite this, Egypt remains committed to honoring its treaty obligations and has resisted the trend of countries withdrawing from BITs. To mitigate risks,Egypt has actively settled disputes, with specialized government committees managing investor claims. Notable, Egypt successfully concluded 14 settlements between 1992 and 2020, with a significant concentration of settlements occurring between 2014 and 2020.
Why This Report Matters?
This article provides valuable guidance to investors seeking to understand Egypt’s legal landscape and government bodies managing treaty-based disputes. It serves as a vital reference for businesses, government officials, and practitioners involved in cross-border investment disputes in the region.
For further insights, read the full report by Karim A. Youssef, César R. Ternieden, and Nouran Salama on Youssef & Partners’ work in investment treaty arbitration in Egypt. Explore how our expertise can support your business in navigating complex treaty frameworks and achieving favorable outcomes.
Full Report: ((https://globalarbitrationreview.com/insight/know-how/investment-treaty-arbitration/report/egypt)) here.
Stay Updated

FAQS: Investment Treaty Arbitration in Egypt
What are investment treaties?
Investment treaties are agreements between countries that establish the framework for protecting investments made by investors from one country in another country. These treaties often include provisions related to the treatment of foreign investors, protection of investments, and mechanisms for resolving disputes.
What protections are typically offered in Egypt’s investment treaties?
Egypt’s investment treaties usually offer key protections such as fair and equitable treatment, protection against expropriation without compensation, and the right to free transfer of funds.
How do these treaties benefit foreign investors in Egypt?
These treaties provide foreign investors with legal assurances regarding the safety of their investments, reduce risks associated with political and economic instability, and establish mechanisms for resolving disputes, which can enhance investor confidence.